These are the tried and tested, environment-agnostic productivity hacks you can apply anywhere and see the results for yourself. Getting the fundamentals right is very important because if you can’t understand the small stuff, you’ll never understand the bigger stuff.
Some might say that this is the only productivity hack there is. Because if you think about it, it encapsulates all other productivity hacks out there.
Need to learn how to manage your tasks better? Someone most probably has figured it out. Need to learn how not to mess up a relationship? Someone already has and knows what to do to avoid it.
“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” -Confucius
Seriously. Go to sleep.
I’ve learned this after a lot of hit and trials, but having a fixed sleep schedule is something that should be the backbone of your personal productivity system. I’ve experimented with sleeping late, sleeping early, sleeping in shifts and this is what I’ve learned: No matter what your sleep time, have a fixed schedule and be disciplined about it.
You can create your own sleep habit, you don’t have to follow anyone else’s. Some people need 8 hours, others just need 6. Just listen to your body and mind, understand how much rest it needs, and try not to lie to yourself. The dividends this habit will pay are enormous.
Read overcommitting.
You don’t need to go to /r/RoastMe to feel bad about yourself. Just overcommit and you’ll be there.
Yes, you can accomplish everything on your plate. No, you can’t do everything at the same time.
Or at the very least, you can’t start doing everything at the same time. If you have one goal on track, you can maybe take another one on. But if you try to accomplish 10 ambitious goals at the same time, you’re most probably going to stress/burn out. Because if each of your goal requires 2 hours of your time and there are only 24 in a day, the math doesn’t add up.
The Pareto principle states that for many outcomes, roughly 80% of consequences come from 20% of causes.
Following the Pareto principle, here are the 20% of the basic and universal productivity “rules”, and not hacks, which cover 80% of what productivity is all about and how to be more productive.
Whenever I want to accomplish something beyond my current level of competence I say this to myself:
”Your 100th [insert what you want to improve] will be good.”
Examples:
I don’t think much about the most talented people around, people who create literally anything and it’s great out of the box, people who can shit roses figuratively speaking. They got lucky playing the genetic game or the talent game.
I’m on the side with people who work, the ones who are not given any talent or chance but create one with sheer effort. And learning from people on this side, I’ve made this ‘100 times the charm’ rule/principle for myself.
The first 99 iterations are the tax I pay to make something happen, to force it into my destiny. The rule also helps you to not get demoralised because you kind of know when to expect some results.
And it follows the same theme of quality vs quantity. You don’t have to be the most talented person that can create quality all the time and you don’t have to be the dullest person who only churns out quantity. You can be the other guy, that uses quantity to reach quality and have a nice little journey to look back on.
What we actually want to improve is the quality of our skills and what we’re doing is providing the quantity of work.
The following is an excerpt from a book called Art and Fear: Observations on the Perils (and Rewards) of Artmaking:
“The ceramics teacher announced on opening day that he was dividing the class into two groups. All those on the left side of the studio, he said, would be graded solely on the quantity of work they produced, all those on the right solely on its quality. His procedure was simple: on the final day of class, he would bring in his bathroom scales and weigh the work of the “quantity” group: fifty pounds of pots rated an “A”, forty pounds a “B”, and so on. Those being graded on “quality”, however, needed to produce only one pot — albeit a perfect one — to get an “A”. Well, came grading time and a curious fact emerged: the works of highest quality were all produced by the group being graded for quantity. It seems that while the “quantity” group was busily churning out piles of work-and learning from their mistakes — the “quality” group had sat theorizing about perfection, and in the end had little more to show for their efforts than grandiose theories and a pile of dead clay.”
It’s not Quantity vs Quality, but in fact Quantity leads to quality.
Mostly it does, many times it doesn’t but it doesn’t matter. The point is to get to action.
The 100 days rule might just be a placebo you tell yourself that a definite milestone exists and upon reaching that milestone you’ll improve some skill.
In reality, some skills are far too complex to be learned let alone mastered in 100 days. But having a 100-day track record of actually working on it is far better than planning/talking about how to get it done or far worse - not doing anything about it.
They say it takes 10,000 hours of work to become a master at something. I don’t want to become a master at something, I just want to get visibly better than my previous self and 100 days of continuous effort over a few hundred hours of work seems to be a good way to get there.
In my endless list of productivity and time management experiments, this is the latest: 3 day sprints.
The title sums up what it is pretty well; which is I work in sprints that are 3 days long.
The why part is explained below.
I found myself shuffling work between 2 kinds of work styles:
These include work that needs to be done over a long period, day in day out, to get any visible results. These are my long-term goals, or much simply put they constitute my current habits. For example gym, coding, reading, writing, journaling, morning/night rituals.
The goals under this category follow a general direction where I want myself to be. For example, I want to get better at journaling is a general goal.
These include tasks that have a deadline and need to be done immediately. For example Office work, reading challenge progress, writing/reading about a particular topic of interest.
The work under this category is very specific, about what, where and when to do something. For example, I want to journal about my improvements and notes in the morning for half an hour for a week is a very specific goal.
What I realised was that work that required intensity was getting ticked off pretty fast but the consistency work was either making slow progress or required a lot of willpower to be completed.
So I decided to shift all the work to intensity mode, which has two benefits. One, things get done pretty quickly. Second, things are kept very interesting.
For example:
So the undertone is still consistent effort, the general direction, but the execution is in intensity, the specific direction.
These three days prints are great because they force you to work better. When you have fewer hours and days to accomplish something, you spend them a little wiser. It’s just Parkinson’s law put into practice.
Parkinson’s law: Work will expand to fill the time allotted for its completion.
So if I’m allowing only 3 days for something to be done, I notice that I’m spending those three days much better than when I know I have a lot of time to complete some work.
One important thing to note here is I’m not just planning my work into these three days sprints, but I’m also scheduling my entertainment and downtime into these sprints. One such goal I set was, along with the ambitious examples above, to watch five movies in three days.
The ideas that give these sprints power are: